User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 8
 Downloands 4
Is chirp more effective than click and tone-burst during oVEMP test?
2020
Journal:  
Annals of Medical Research
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: We aimed to show the effectivity of chirp stimulus and to compare with tone-burst and click stimulus during ocular VEMP (oVEMP) and also to exhibit same stimulation response pattern in utricle as seen in cochlea. Material and Methods: A total of 85 healthy volunteers without any vestibular and otologic disease history were enrolled in this study. Three different types of air conduction stimuli (tone-burst, click and chirp) were used for the oVEMP test. N1, P1 latencies, N1P1 amplitudes and asymmetry ratios were investigated for each stimulus type according to age subgroups and sex.Results: The ratio of presence of oVEMP response was found to be 94.1%, 82.1% and 98.8% with tone-burst, click and chirp stimuli respectively. The latencies were significantly shorter in chirp stimulus with respect to others in both ears. The amplitudes were also significantly larger in chirp stimulus with respect to other in both ears. According to analysis of N1P1 asymmetry ratios, N1 and P1 latency asymmetry, there were no statistically significant difference in these values within each stimulus types.Conclusion: oVEMP is more practical, easier, faster and less invasive method. oVEMP results with chirp stimulus have shorter latency and higher amplitude and more clear waveform morphology with higher ratio of response when compared to click and tone-burst stimulus. As a result, chirp is a reliable and suitable stimulus type for oVEMP analysis. In the light of these unique results with chirp stimulus, utricular hair cells may have similar frequency specific tonotopic organization as seen in cochlea. Downloads Download data is not yet available. Article Details How to Cite Bas, B., Keseroglu, K., Er, S., Ozdek, A., & Hakan Korkmaz, M. (2021). Is chirp more effective than click and tone-burst during oVEMP test? . Annals of Medical Research, 27(3), 0819–0824. Retrieved from https://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/669 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Volume 27 Issue 3 (2020): March Section Original Articles CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

Keywords:

null
2020
Author:  
0
2020
Author:  
Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles












Annals of Medical Research

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 3.232
Cite : 305
Annals of Medical Research