User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 2
 Views 16
 Downloands 1
Köpeklerde laparoskopik destekli gastropeksi ile klasik gastropeksi operasyonunun karşılaştırılması
2014
Journal:  
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

Amaç: Profilaktik gastropeksi özellikle büyük ırk köpeklerde gastrik dilatasyon volvulus (GDV)'un önlenmesi için yapılan cerrahi bir uygulamadır. Bu çalışmada, GDV'nin profilaksisinde etkili olan klasik gastropeksi ile laparoskopik destekli gastropeksi yöntemleri iyileşmedeki etkileri ve uygulanma kolaylığı açısından karşılaştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma materyalini 12 adet köpek oluşturdu. Köpeklerin ağırlıkları ortalama 20-30 kg olarak belirlendi. Köpekler iki gruba ayrıldı. 1. Gruptaki köpeklere klasik gastropeksi (ventral orta hat gastropeksi) yöntemi uygulandı. 2. Gruptaki köpeklere ise laparoskopik destekli gastropeksi operasyonu uygulandı. Biyokimyasal analizler ve kan gazı muayeneleri için preoperatif dönem ve postoperatif 9. günde kan alınarak incelendi. Ultrasonografik muayeneler 5-7.5 MHz'lik konveks problar ile gerçekleştirildi. Postoperatif dönem 9. günde köpeklere direkt ve indirekt radyografik muayeneler yapıldı. Bulgular: Post-operatif olarak köpeklerin, 9 gün süreyle operasyon sonunda günlük kontrolleri yapıldı. Sonuçlar, her iki operatif tekniğin hızlı ve kolay uygulanabilirliğini ortaya koydu. Klasik gastropeksi için ortalama operasyon süresinin 20 dakika olduğu belirlenirken, laparoskopi grubunda bu sürenin 41.5 dakika ortalamasında olduğu belirlendi. Her iki cerrahi müdahalenin sonucunda post-operatif bakımda dikişlerin alınmasına kadar komplikasyonla karşılaşılmadı. Ultrasonografik muayenede, her iki grup için gastrik peristaltik kontraksiyonlar postoperatif 7. günde sayıldı. Klasik gastropeksi ve laparoskopik gastropekside 4-5 kontraksiyon ortalaması bulundu. Radyolojik muayene, midenin lokalizasyonu, ölçüsü, şekli, içeriği, gastrik rugal ve duvarda herhangi patolojik bir durum ile karşılaşılmadı. Öneri: Çalışma sonunda laparoskopik gastropeksi ve klasik gastropeksinin acil cerrahi müdahalelerde ve profilaktik amaç için uygulanabileceği önerildi.

Keywords:

Comparison of laparoscopically-supported gastropex with classical gastropex surgery in dogs
2014
Author:  
Abstract:

Purpose: Preventive gastropsy is a surgical application made to prevent gastric dilatation volvulus (GDV) especially in large breed dogs. In this study, classical gastrophesis and laparoscopically-supported gastrophesis methods, which were effective in the prevention of GDV, were compared in terms of the effects on healing and the ease of application. Tool and Method: The research material was created by 12 dogs. The weight of dogs was estimated at an average of 20-30 kg. The dogs were divided into two groups. 1 . The dogs in the group were applied the classic method of gastropexy (ventral mid-line gastropexy). 2nd The dogs in the group were subjected to laparoscopic-supported gastrophysical surgery. For biochemical analyses and blood gas tests, the preoperative period and postoperative 9th day were examined by taking blood. Ultrasound examinations were performed with 5-7.5 MHz conventional probes. On the 9th day of the postoperative period, the dogs were direct and indirect radiographic examinations. Results: Post-operative dogs were checked daily after the operation for 9 days. The results showed the rapid and easy implementation of both operating techniques. The average duration of the operation for classical gastrophesis was 20 minutes, while the average duration for the laparoscopy group was 41.5 minutes. As a result of both surgical interventions, there was no complication until the post-operative care was taken. In the ultrasound examination, gastric peristaltic contractions for both groups were counted on the postoperative 7th day. In the classical and laparoscopic gastrophesis, the average of 4-5 contractions was found. Radiological examination, the localization of the stomach, size, shape, content, stomach rugal and any pathological condition on the wall were not met. Recommendation: At the end of the study, laparoscopic gastropexy and classic gastropexy were suggested to be applied in emergency surgical interventions and for preventive purposes.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.407
Cite : 1.280
2023 Impact : 0.068
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences