Özet:

 Forests are an indispensable natural resource necessary for the continuation of life in a healthy environment. Due to these importance, forests are protected by the Constitution in our law and have been subject to separate legal arrangements. Accordingly, forests are under the supervision of the State. At the same time, narrowing of forest boundaries cannot be done. However, some places are excluded from the rule that narrowing of forest boundaries cannot be made. Because, the legislator did not consider it appropriate for the country's economy to keep these places within the forest boundary. One of these places is the areas where the land, city, town and village structures are collectively located, which have been found to be useful for use in various agricultural areas or animal husbandry that have completely lost their forest characteristics in terms of science and science before 31/12/1981. These areas are known as "2/B areas" since they have found regulation in Article 2/B of the Forest Law No. 6831. Some of the arrangements made in the past regarding the evaluation of 2/B areas have been the subject of annulment decisions of the Constitutional Court, and legal loophole and uncertainty have arisen in the status and evaluation of these areas. For this reason, the Law No. 6292, known to the public as the “2/B Law”, has entered into force. In the study, the regulations introduced by Law No. 6292 on the status and evaluation of lands removed outside the forest boundary and whether these regulations provide solutions to these legal gaps and uncertainties were examined

Anahtar Kelimeler: