Views
1
Audio Listening
1
Bu çalışmada 12 Eylül 1980 askerî darbesinin tanıklarının yayımlanmış anıları, Yehudith Auerbach ve Murat Paker’in belirttiği geçmişle yüzleşme aşamaları açısından değerlendirilmiştir. 12 Eylül dönemi siyasal hareketler açısından, Kürt siyasal hareketi, sol siyasal hareket ve ülkücü siyasal hareket olarak üçe ayrılmıştır. Kürt siyasal hareketi ile sol siyasal hareketin çok örgütlü-çok parçalı yapısı nedeniyle farklı örgütlerde yer almış olan tanıkların kitaplarının değerlendirilmesine önem verilmiştir. Geçmişle yüzleşme ile geçmişle hesaplaşmanın birbirinden farklı kavramlar olduğu ve dolayısıyla aynı olgu için bu kavramlardan birinin ya da diğerinin kullanılmasının olanaklı olmadığı savunulmuştur. Tanıkların anıları incelenirken geçmişle yüzleşmenin eşdeğerlilik, saygı, duygudaşlık ve anlama aşamaları dikkate alınmıştır.
In this study, the publicated memories of the witnesses of the September 12, 1980 military coup were evaluated in terms of the stages of confrontation with the past mentioned by Yehudith Auerbach and Murat Paker. In terms of political movements, the 12th September period was divided into three categories: the Kurdish political movement, the left political movement and the landscaping political movement. The Kurdish political movement and the left political movement, due to the multi-organized and multi-party structure of the Kurdish political movement, have been focused on the evaluation of the books of witnesses who have participated in different organizations. Facing with the past and calculating with the past are different concepts and therefore it is not possible to use one or the other of these concepts for the same fact. When studying the memories of witnesses, equality, respect, emotionality and understanding stages of facing the past were taken into account.
This study uses the stages of coming to terms with the past, as laid out by Yehudith Auerbach and Murat Paker (specifically the stages of “equivalence,” “respect,” “sympathy,” and “understanding”), to evaluate the published memoires of witnesses of the miliary coup of 12 September 1980. Three main political movements dominated the period: the Kurdish movement, the leftist movement, and the nationalist movement. Because of the multiple organizations involved in and the fragmentary nature of the Kurdish and leftist movements, this study has made a special effort to include memoires written by members of different organizations. On the basis of these accounts, this study argues that “coming to terms with the past” and “reckoning with the past” are two distinct processes that do not refer to the same phenomenon.
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
