User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 92
 Downloands 33
Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi (TPAB) Modelinin İlkokul Matematik (İM) Öğretimine Uygulanması: Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması
2018
Journal:  
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

The present study aimed to adapt the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) for mathematics teaching questionnaire into Turkish for classroom teachers who work in public schools. There were three stages in the questionnaire adaptation process. The questionnaire’s language validity was established in the first stage, validity in the second and reliability in the third stage.  Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) have been utilized in establishing the validity of the questionnaire. 372 classroom teachers’ responses have been used in EFA and 310 for CFA. A four-factor solution emerged as a result of EFA. These factors (in the order of factor loadings) were named as: 1) Knowledge of Teaching Mathematics with Technology (KTMT) under which items that belonged to Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) sub-sections merged together;  2) Knowledge of Teaching Mathematics (KTM) under which items that belonged to Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and Pedagogy Knowledge (PK) sub-sections merged together as one factor; 3) Content Knowledge for Mathematics (CKM) which included items from the Content Knowledge (CK) sub-section; and 4) Technology Knowledge (TK). Those four factors explained 62.20 % of the total variation in the questionnaire. In addition, the results of CFA suggested a good model fit; NNFI .98, NFI .97, CFI .98, IFI .98, RMR .06, and RMSEA .07. Cronbach’s Alpha (α) internal consistency and total item correlations were calculated to establish reliability. The internal consistency (α) for the whole questionnaire was calculated as .97. The α levels for each subscale was; .96 for TPACK, .94 for PCK, .89 for CK, and .91 for TK and total item correlation coefficients were higher than .30. Evaluation of these results suggests that a valid and reliable Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge questionnaire, which consists of 47 items under four subscales (KTMT, KTM, CKM, and TK), was developed.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 588
Cite : 5.657
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi