User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 32
 Views 39
 Downloands 8
Dijital Eğitim Platformları Arasında EBA’nın Yeri ile İlgili Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri
2019
Journal:  
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu araştırma, fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin Eğitim Bilişim Ağıında (EBA) yer alan öğretim materyalleri ve yararlandıkları diğer eğitim platformlarında yer alan öğretim materyallerinin karşılaştırmasını amaçlamaktadır. EBA kullanışlılık, yeterlilik, müfredat uygunluğu, tasarım, içerik doluluğu, özgünlük gibi konularda incelenerek diğer eğitim platformları ile karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. Araştırmada görüşme tekniği ve amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar çeşitli şehirlerde görev yapan 20 fen bilimleri öğretmenidir. Veri toplama aracı olarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu elde edilen verilerin analizinde içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. EBA platformunda yer alan materyaller diğer dijital öğretim materyalleri ile karşılaştırıldığında yeterliliğin henüz beklenen seviyede olmadığı görülmüştür. EBA platformunda yer alan öğretim materyalleri diğer dijital öğretim materyallerine bakarak daha az kullanılmaktadır. Kullanışlılık açısından karşılaştırmalar yapılmış ve görsel bakımdan düzenlemeler olması gerektiği belirtilmiştir. Öğretmenler sık kullandıkları materyalleri sıralarken ders planı yapabilme, planı kaydetme, aradığını kolay bulabilme gibi ölçütler ön plana çıkarmaktadırlar. İçerik güncelliği ve müfredat uygunluğu öğretmenlerce, diğer dijital öğretim materyallerine göre yeterli bulunmamıştır. Haberler ve süreli dergiler bölümleri, diğer dijital öğretim materyallerinde çok sık rastlanmayan, Eğitim Bilişim Ağı’na özgü beğenilen ve en çok dile getirilen kısımlar olmuştur. Eğitim Bilişim Ağı platformunun tanıtımı yetersiz bulunmuştur. Eğitim Bilişim Ağı üzerine yapılan geliştirme çalışmaları öğretmenler tarafından beğenilmektedir.

Keywords:

Dijital Eğitim Platformları Arasında EBA’nın Yeri ile İlgili Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

This research aims to compare the teaching materials found in the Education Information Network (EBA) of teachers of sciences with the teaching materials found in other educational platforms they benefit from. The EBA has been compared with other educational platforms by studying subjects such as usefulness, qualification, curriculum suitability, design, content filling, originality. In the study, the interview technique and the purpose sample method were used. The participants are 20 teachers of sciences working in different cities. A semi-configured conversation form as a data collection tool; the content analysis method is used in the analysis of the obtained data. When the materials on the EBA platform are compared with other digital teaching materials, it has been seen that the proficiency is not yet at the expected level. Teaching materials on the EBA platform are used less than other digital teaching materials. Comparisons were made in terms of usability and it was stated that visual arrangements should be made. When teachers list the materials they use frequently; They emphasize criteria such as making a lesson plan, recording the plan, and finding what they are looking for easily. Content up-to-date and curriculum compliance were not found sufficient by teachers compared to other digital teaching materials. News and periodic magazines sections, which are not very frequently found in other digital teaching materials, are the most popular and expressed sections that are specific to the Education Information Network. The promotion of the educational information network platform has been found insufficient. The work on the educational information network is loved by the teachers.

Opinions Of Science Teachers On The Status Of Eba Among Digital Education Platforms
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The importance of technology has become increased and rapidly affected all living spaces in our age. The development of technology is much faster than in past centuries. The digital revolution that has taken place has caused many positive and negative influences in education. Various and comprehensive projects are being put into practice for the adaptation of education and technology in Turkey. The EBA (Educational Information Network), social education platform, is recognized as one of the leaders of these projects. Such a significant investment of public enterprise is seen worthy to investigate according to its development, durability, competitiveness, and usefulness. The opinions of the science teachers interviewed about EBA have been tried to be revealed with this study. The aim of this study is to reveal the technology-friendly science teachers' comparisons of Educational Information Network with other digital education platforms in terms of content, visuality, curriculum conformity, usability. Trying to understand comparatively why the teachers use which software, the positive and negative aspects of EBA can be seen. The use of technology in education takes its place among the essential components of educational institutions day by day. In such an environment, it is also important that what teachers think about the EBA application, which can be considered as the first comprehensive initiative by the Ministry of National Education. Evaluating the perspectives of science teachers about EBA application can also benefit upon the development and continuity of EBA. In this study, interview technique, one of the qualitative research data collection methods, was used. Purposeful sampling method was used to interview. Participants of the research are 20 science teachers who work in various cities (Tokat, Sivas, Amasya, Erzincan, Ordu and Manisa). While choosing the participants, teachers who use technology effectively, have mastered the technological tools and received in-service training about EBA was tried to be preferred. Some of the participating teachers have the ability to design digital content. Semi-structured interview form was used as data collection tool. Pilot application of the interview was done with 3 science teachers working in Tokat. After the pilot application, changes were made to the interview forms in line with the opinions received and the forms were presented to the experts for their validity. Interview questions were sent to 5 specialists who were working on the field and the interview form was corrected according to their opinions. In order to collect the data, interviews with 20 science teachers face to face and on internet were conducted by using the latest form of interview protocol. An appointment was made prior to interviews and it was stated that the interview could take an average of 30 minutes. In the analysis of the data, content analysis method was used. Teachers generally think that the digital materials used in science teaching, including EBA, are not at the expected level yet. In terms of findings, the Education Information Network is not yet at the expected level of competence when compared to other digital educational materials. The Education Information Network social education platform is less used than other digital materials. Content up-to-dateness and curriculum conformity were not found to be adequate by teachers, compared to other digital educational materials. The news and periodicals sections have become popular and most frequently expressed parts of the Educational Information Network, which are not very common in other digital educational materials. Teachers generally use digital education materials for test-solving, narrating the subject during the lesson, seeing the news, and downloading digital content. In order to increase the competitiveness of EBA and to make it more usable, it must have an up-to-date and sufficient content. Teachers argue that the content a digital platform is especially influence the user habits. EBA platform is not seen as fully functional by science teacher because they expect some other properties such as preparing and recording pre-class plans. It was stated that the EBA platform had to be rearranged to prevent time loss. Another issue that is thought by teachers is that increasing color and images may be more beneficial. The science teachers who participated in the research argued that EBA would develop and become permanent if it can become a free platform where the sharing increases, the content enriches, and the free discussions can be done. In other educational software, while the content created by a team is usually shared as a product, EBA has the ability to collect all teachers under one roof by working with common mind. It is thought that more careful content filtering will increase the quality when sharing is done. At a time when the government had such large projects in educational settings; the development of EBA as a software candidate that will fill up the empty area is a good opportunity. In general, by identifying the preference reasons of the frequently used educational software, the deficiencies of the EBA can be eliminated. EBA seems necessary and important because it is thought of as software that will fill in the hardware in the schools. Within the context of the Fatih project, the majority of the schools have interactive boards, so a good software to be used is also desired by teachers. However, it is also important that it fulfill the criteria that teachers and students expect. The teachers interviewed about the EBA found that the EBA platform is valuable and promising in general. 

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 679
Cite : 4.689
2023 Impact : 0.517
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi