Views
33
Downloands
2
Siyasi partiler, seçimler aracılığıyla iktidara sahip/ortak olarak veya en azın-dan mecliste temsil edilerek seçmenlere vermiş oldukları sözleri yerine getir-me gayre-ti içerisinde olan yapılardır. Siyasi yarış içerisinde olan bu yapılar, ülke siyaseti-nin işler hale getirilmesi veya etkinleştirilmesi için sürekli seçim usullerini güncelleme arzusu içerisinde olurlar. Bu güncellemelerin arkasında kimi zaman iktidarı kaybetmeme düşüncesi yatmaktadır. Ancak kimi zaman-larda bu güncelleme ihtiyacı bir zorunluluk haline gelmektedir. Siyasi istikrar-sızlıkların ve tıkanıklıkların sıklıkla görülmesi, seçim sistemlerinde temsilde adalet aleyhine olacak şekilde bir reforma gidilmesine yol açmaktadır. Yönetimde istikrar için temsilde adaletten taviz veren seçim sistemlerinden birisi de çoğunluk ödüllü seçim sistemidir. Bu seçim sistemini en öz şekilde, seçmen-den en yüksek oyu alarak ödüllendirilen bir partinin, bir de seçim sis-temi tarafından ödüllendirilerek ilave milletvekili aldığı sistem şeklinde ta-nımlamak mümkündür. Bu çalışmada, bu seçim sisteminin uygulandığı ülke-lerdeki verilerden hareketle yapılan analizler ile seçim sisteminin ne gibi so-nuçlar doğurduğu irdelenerek sistemin daha yakından tanınmasına çalışılmış-tır.
Political parties are the structures that are in the effort to fulfill the promises they have given to the voters by means of elections, in the power of partners or at least by being represented in the parliament. These structures, which are in political race, are in the desire to update the continuous election procedures to make or activate the country’s politics. Behind these updates is sometimes the idea of not losing power. But sometimes, this update becomes an obligation. The frequent observation of political instability and blocks leads to a reform in the electoral systems that is representatively against justice. One of the electoral systems that represent justice for stability in the administration is the majority-premised electoral system. This electoral system is possible in the most specific way, in the form of a party awarded by the highest votes of the voter, and in the form of a system that is awarded by the election party by the extra parliamentary party. In this study, the analysis of the data in the countries in which this electoral system is applied and the analysis of how the electoral system generates so-systems has been tried to recognize the system closer.
Political parties are in continual pursuit of updating the election procedures with a view to keeping functional or effective the politics of their country. Sometimes the underlying reason behind such updates might be the concern of not losing the power. On the other hand, these updates can occasionally stem from a necessity and become imperative. Frequently experienced political instabilities and dead-locks can lead to a reform in electoral systems which is injustice in representation. One of the electoral systems which make concessions to justice in representation for the sake of stability in government is the majority bonus system. This electoral system can be defined, as most concisely as possible, as the system in which a party rewarded with the highest number of votes from the electorate is rewarded once more with prize seats by the electoral system. This study has tried to facilitate better recognition of this electoral system through examining its practical outcomes in the light of the analyses conducted based on the data obtained from the countries where this electoral system is in effect.
Field : Hukuk
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
