Özet:

The rural, which is one of the main issues in the Turkish economic thought, has been often addressed in the hegemonic speech of the late Ottomanist period to the early Republic period. In this perspective that involves a continuity of thought, rural problem areas have often become agenda issues: property inequality, machinery in agriculture, efficiency, debt mechanisms, inspection, etc. As a country captured in the early stages of late capitalization in the 29th crisis, Turkey has invited the bright to the stage in order to produce solutions with economic state intervention/state capitalism to the problems chronicalized by the rural and unlimited crisis that includes the wider part of society. The Kadro movement, together with Peker, Inönü, Ağaoğlu, Başar and Bayar, has taken its place on the stage as a magazine found in the ideas of the elites on many topics that respond to this invitation and include the rural. In this study we have studied how the problem areas of the countryside are addressed by staff writers around the terrakki/developing speech. In this context, it has been attempted to reveal how the topics described above are addressed along with the periodic/thought backgrounds.

Anahtar Kelimeler: