Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye ekonomisinde TÜİK tarafından sınıflandırılan 12 mal ve hizmet grubu olan Gıda ve Alkolsüz İçecekler, Alkollü İçecekler ve Tütün, Giyim ve Ayakkabı, Konut, Su, Elektrik, Gaz ve Diğer Yakıtlar, Mobilya, Ev Aletleri ve Ev Bakım Hizmetleri, Sağlık, Ulaştırma, Haberleşme, Eğlence ve Kültür, Eğitim, Lokanta ve Oteller ve Çeşitli Mal ve Hizmetlerine ait enflasyon oranlarının genel enflasyon oranlarına yakınsayıp yakınsamadığını test etmektir. Bu doğrultuda 2003:02 2019:03 dönemlerini kapsayan aylık enflasyon verilerine Kruse (2011) birim kök testi ve Hepsağ (2019) tarafından geliştirilen, yapısal kırılmaları ve doğrusal dışılığı birlikte dikkate alan birim kök testi uygulanmıştır. Ampirik analiz sonucunda Kruse (2011) testi için hiçbir mal ve hizmet grubu için yakınsama hipotezi geçerli değilken Hepsağ (2019) testi için 12 mal ve hizmet grubundan yalnızca mobilya, ev aletleri ve ev bakım hizmetlerinin genel enflasyon oranlarına yakınsadığı diğer mal ve hizmet gruplarında yakınsama olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu sonuçlara göre uygulanan para politikalarının genel olarak mal ve hizmet fiyatlarına yansımadığı ve uygulanan politikaların başarılı olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
The aim of this study is to test that food and non-alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages and tobacco, clothing and shoes, housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels, furniture, household tools and household care services, health, transport, communication, entertainment and culture, education, restaurants and hotels and various goods and services are close to the general inflation rates. In this regard, the monthly inflation data covering the 2003:02 2019:03 periods have been applied to Kruse (2011) unit root test and Hepsağ (2019) unit root test, which takes into account structural breakdowns and linear excretion together. The empirical analysis found that the approximation hypothesis for any group of goods and services for the Kruse (2011) test did not apply, while the approximation hypothesis for any group of goods and services for the Hepsağ (2019) test found that only furniture, household equipment and household care services from 12 groups of goods and services were approximate to the overall inflation rate; that there was no approximation in other groups of goods and services. These findings conclude that monetary policies are not generally reflected in the prices of goods and services and that the policies are not successful.
The purpose of this study is to test whether the inflation rates of the 12 goods and services group classified by the Turkish Statistical Institute (Food and Soft Drinks, Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Clothing and Footwear, Housing, Water, Electricity, Gas and Other Fuels, Furniture, Home Appliances and Home Care Services, Health, Transport, Communication, Entertainment and Culture, Education, Restaurants and Hotels and Various Goods and Services), converge with general inflation rates. In line with this, the Kruse (2011) unit root test and the Hepsağ (2019) unit root test, which considers structural breaks and nonlinearity were applied to the monthly inflation data covering the periods 2003: 02 2019: 03. As a result of the empirical analysis, while the convergence hypothesis was not valid for the Kruse (2011) test for any of the goods and services groups; only Furniture, Home Appliances and Home Care Services converged with the general inflation rates out of the 12 goods and services groups; it is concluded that there is no convergence in other goods and service groups according to the Hepsağ (2019) test. According to these results, it is concluded that the monetary policies applied are not reflected in the prices of goods and services in general and the policies implemented are not successful.
Alan : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|