Özet:

Over the course of the 600 years of the Ottoman Empire, significant changes have occurred in the structure of the state. The XIII. The state established as a monarch at the beginning of the century rapidly expanded, with the Fethi of Istanbul with the XV. In the middle of the century it became an empire, XVI. In the past century, Europe has become a state of affluence. The state developed on the basis of military organization was governed by the Ottoman prince with a absolute understanding. In fact, absolute governance is considered an important rule in terms of the functioning of the state. For example, the XVI. The institutions of the Ottoman Empire, which in the century was the European state, were studied by the Western and the secret of Ottoman success was tried to be understood. In this period, it was stated that the Ottoman prince ruled the state with the absolute monarchy and that the success of the Empire was thanks to this form of governance. Fatih Sultan Mehmed, Yavuz Sultan Selim and the lawful Sultan Suleyman have the importance that this method is applied and successfully made in terms of Empire, the Ottoman state men have also expressed its importance. In fact, one of the elements expressed in the efforts to return to the old successful and powerful days of the state after the Sultan of Solomon is the disorders that arise in the form of the absolute government. of XVI. By the end of the century, ancient military successes have not continued and traditional reform efforts have emerged. The Charlottes Treaty, signed after the military defeat in 1699, was considered a major breakthrough point. After this treaty, the necessity of making a western-style relief in the Ottoman military structure was accepted and civil bureaucrates in the ruling class began to rise. The result of various problems and failures in the XVIII. In the century the superiority of the West was accepted. Thus, there have begun disruptions not only in the military, but also in the administrative, financial and social areas. by Mahmoud III. The reforms under the period of Mustafa and I. Abdülhamid followed the reforms of the Lale era. It is recognized that the reforms in the Lale era have developed in the framework of a different reform concept from the previous periods due to some of their characteristics. One of the main reasons for this is that the reforms of this period are not limited to the military sphere. and III. With the time of Selim, the reforms were implemented within the Nizam-i Cedid framework. During this period, the traditional reform concept was completely abandoned. The Lale Age and III. The reforms of Nizam-i Cedid in the Selim period ended with a rebellion. and II. In the Mahmud sovereignty, significant reforms took place after the removal of the New Jersey Hall. In 1826 the removal of the New Jersey Tower was a new breakthrough point. After that, there have been significant changes in the government. For example, the traditional institutions were created instead of Western-style institutions. Thus, the purpose of the state is to be saved by the new reforms, but as a result, the new institutions and the power of the king have been limited. This situation has led to mutations in the absolute governance of the Ottoman princes. With the Tanzimat period, many areas have been sheltered and the Babyaili bureaucrates have gained power within the ruling class. The new Ottoman bureaucrates, especially those who know Europe and know foreign languages, have gained activity during this period. Thus, the change in the state body continued, new laws were adopted and significant transformations were made in the Ottoman government. This change can also be seen through the words of the Ottoman princes of the time. In this study, the arrangements arising in the state agency during the Tanzimat period were mentioned and the difference in the understanding of the Ottoman administration was tried to be observed through the words of Sultan Abdülmecid and Sultan Abdülaziz. In this context, the new administrative practices adopted by Sultan Abdülmecid and Sultan Abdülaziz were addressed and the aim was to study the changes that occurred in the conception of absolute governance according to the past periods. In fact, when the nuts studied at the opening of the new state institutions of Sultan Abdülmecid and Sultan Abdülaziz are examined, it appears that significant changes have occurred according to past practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler: