Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 126
 İndirme 71
Karsılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme: Türk Ceza Hukuku ile Kıbrıs Ceza Hukuku Açısından “işlenemez Suç”un Değerlendirilmesi
2012
Dergi:  
Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

A conduct is criminalised when the act must be legitimate for constituting the result of offence. This convenience is important for all criminalised conducts. If the conduct is adequate for getting the result of offence, it is also either illegal or derogative. In examination about convenience to the result, we also discuss “impossibility”. In Turkish Criminal Code, there is no provision about impossibility. The problem is resolved in the case of typical crime in the framework of general criminal principles. In Cyprus Criminal Code the article of 366/3 has a rule which is understood by interpretation. According to this article “it is immaterial that by reason of circumstances not known to the offender it is impossible in fact to commit the offences”. We have to interpret this provision to get this result: The intention of offender is the most important element (mens rea), so the other circumstances are immaterial. The offender does not know the fact that it is impossible to commit the typical offence. We can classify the impossibility as legal and factual. The legal impossibility is defined that offender does an act to commit an offence, but the lack of an element or the misknowledge about the provision is the one of them that consists legal impossibility. The criminal law does not impose any sanctions in those cases

Anahtar Kelimeler:

A Distorting Review: The Assessment Of The "unprocessable Crime" In Terms Of Turkish Criminal Law and Cyprus Criminal Law
2012
Yazar:  
Özet:

A behavior is criminalized when the act must be legitimate for constituting the result of the offence. This convenience is important for all criminalized conducts. If the behavior is adequate for getting the result of the offence, it is also either illegal or derogative. In examination about convenience to the result, we also discuss "impossibility". In the Turkish Criminal Code, there is no provision about impossibility. The problem is resolved in the case of typical crime in the framework of general criminal principles. In Cyprus Criminal Code the article of 366/3 has a rule which is understood by interpretation. According to this article "it is immaterial that by reason of circumstances not known to the offender it is impossible in fact to commit the offences." We have to interpret this provision to get this result: The intention of offender is the most important element (mens rea), so the other circumstances are immaterial. The offender does not know the fact that it is impossible to commit the typical offence. We can classify the impossibility as legal and factual. The legal impossibility is defined that the offender does an act to commit an offence, but the lack of an element or the misknowledge about the provision is one of them that consists of legal impossibility. The criminal law does not impose any sanctions in those cases

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler








Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi

Alan :   Hukuk

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 835
Atıf : 5.438
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini