Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 7
 Görüntüleme 125
 İndirme 61
Sosyobilimsel Konulara Dayalı Fen Eğitiminin 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sosyobilimsel Konulara Bakış Açıları, Bilimsel ve Yansıtıcı Düşünme Becerileri Üzerine Etkisi
2020
Dergi:  
Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty
Yazar:  
Özet:

The purpose of the present study is to examine the effects of science education based on socioscientific issues (SSI) through the constructivist approach to attitudes towardas SSI, scientific reasoning and reflective thinking skills of 7th grade students. In the study, a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design with control group was used. The study was conducted by participation of 51 7th grade students in the academic year of 2016-2017. Sample of the study is determined through selection of convenient sample. In the process of application, both experimental and control groups’ lessons were planned according to 5E learning model in the manner that including many learning-teaching method and techniques based on constructivist approach. On the other hand, Pollution of River Ergene, Utilization of Food Additive and Lake Gala National Park issues in the context of SSI were entegrated into chemical industry biodiversity topics for the experimental group, whereas lessons were processed without underlining SSI in the control group. The Attitudes towards Socioscientific Issues Scale (ATSIS), Lawson’s Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTRS), and reflective thinking scale (RTS) were employed to collect data. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques through SPSS program. After determining that the necessary assumptions were met for the ANCOVA analysis, ANCOVA technique was utilized. According to ANCOVA results, a significant difference was found between the ATSIS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups in favour of the experimental group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between CTRS and RTS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

7 Responses To Social Education. The Influence Of Classmates’ Views On Social and Reflective Subjects On Their Scientific and Reflective Thinking Skills
2020
Yazar:  
Özet:

The purpose of the present study is to examine the effects of science education based on socioscientific issues (SSI) through the constructivist approach to attitudes towards SSI, scientific reasoning and reflective thinking skills of 7th grade students. In the study, a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design with control group was used. The study was conducted by participation of 51 7th grade students in the academic year of 2016-2017. The sample of the study is determined through the selection of convenient sample. In the process of application, both experimental and control groups' lessons were planned according to the 5E learning model in the manner that includes many learning-teaching methods and techniques based on constructivist approach. On the other hand, Pollution of River Ergene, Utilization of Food Additive and Lake Gala National Park issues in the context of SSI were integrated into chemical industry biodiversity topics for the experimental group, whereas lessons were processed without underlining SSI in the control group. The Attitudes towards Socioscientific Issues Scale (ATSIS), Lawson's Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (CTRS), and reflective thinking scale (RTS) were employed to collect data. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques through the SPSS program. After determining that the necessary assumptions were met for the ANCOVA analysis, ANCOVA technique was used. According to ANCOVA results, a significant difference was found between the ATSIS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups in favour of the experimental group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between CTRS and RTS posttest scores of the experimental and control groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler


Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 239
Atıf : 529
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini