User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 5
 Views 183
 Downloands 43
Safevi Kroniklerinde Çaldıran Savaşı
2019
Journal:  
Osmanlı Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Although five centuries passed since the Ottoman’s Chāldirān victory (1514), the consequences of this battle are still a disputed issue. While Ottoman chronicles present the result of this battle as a decisive victory, Safavid sources refrain from announcing it as a defeat. Safavid sources interpret it as a tactical withdrawal on their part, and attempt to justify their claims though various explanations. Based on Safavid chronicles, which have been neglected by modern historiography, this article aims to discuss the perception and interpretation of the Battle of Chāldirān by the contemporary Safavid chronics. The appraisal of both Ottoman and Safavid sources will enable a better understanding of the issue. 

Keywords:

The strike in the chronicles
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Although five centuries passed since the Ottoman's Chāldirān victory (1514), the consequences of this battle are still a disputed issue. While Ottoman chronicles present the result of this battle as a decisive victory, Safavid sources refrain from announcing it as a defeat. Safavid sources interpret it as a tactical withdrawal on their part, and attempt to justify their claims though various explanations. Based on Safavid chronicles, which have been neglected by modern historiography, this article aims to discuss the perception and interpretation of the Battle of Chāldirān by the contemporary Safavid chronics. The assessment of both Ottoman and Safavid sources will enable a better understanding of the issue.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Osmanlı Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 160
Cite : 180
Osmanlı Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi