User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 2
 Views 75
 Downloands 29
Teknoloji ve Tasarım Dersi Öğretim Programlarının (2006-2018) Program Ögelerine Göre Karşılaştırılmalı Değerlendirilmesi
2019
Journal:  
Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this research is to make a comparative evaluation of the curricula of the 2006 and 2018 Technology and Design courses according to the program components. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. The research is a descriptively designed descriptive study. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. As a result of the research, it can be said that in 2006 and 2018 TT course curriculum, the elements of the curriculum are fully present but are taken into consideration in both programs, even with some changes. 2006 and 2018 curriculum; It is seen that there are significant differences in learning areas, content and measurement and evaluation dimensions. It is seen that the most important difference between the programs is in the learning area approach and the subjects and units are completely changed. It was found that there was no significant difference in acquisitions numbers in both programs but the acquisitions were almost completely changed depending on the learning areas. It was determined that the acquisitions were numerically higher in both programs, the content and learning teaching process changed almost completely, while the basic approach remained the same in the assessment assessment dimension, but the tools and methods that were dealt with in the 2006 program were not included in the 2018 program.

Keywords:

Comparative Assessment of the Teaching Programs of Technology and Design (2006-2018) according to the Program Subjects
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this research is to make a comparative evaluation of the curricula of the 2006 and 2018 Technology and Design courses according to the program components. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. The research is a descriptively designed descriptive study. The data obtained by document analysis were evaluated with descriptive analysis. As a result of the research, it can be said that in 2006 and 2018 TT course curriculum, the elements of the curriculum are fully present but are taken into consideration in both programs, even with some changes. 2006 and 2018 curriculum; It is seen that there are significant differences in learning areas, content and measurement and evaluation dimensions. It is seen that the most important difference between the programs is in the learning area approach and the subjects and units are completely changed. It was found that there was no significant difference in acquisitions numbers in both programs but the acquisitions were almost completely changed depending on the learning areas. It was determined that the acquisitions were numerically higher in both programs, the content and learning teaching process changed almost completely, while the basic approach remained the same in the assessment assessment dimension, but the tools and methods that were dealt with in the 2006 program were not included in the 2018 program.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles




Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 313
Cite : 528
Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi