Özet:

One of the elements that show the righteousness in religious-political-social discussions is that the issue is addressed by the source of the issue. It is possible to see this situation only in the first generations concerning the Sahabe today. It is the first time that the people of the world have had a great deal of interest in the world, and the first time that the people of the world have had a great deal of interest in the world, the first time that the people of the world have had a great deal of interest in the world. His view on the zakat of the rich, his comment on the kenz verse, his discussion with Muâviye, his call to Medina by the Khalifa Osman (r.a.) and his expulsion to Rebez, and eventually his death here, many of them have been mentioned in the sources on the occasion of the issues such as his death. It is enough to even look at the headlines of the books and articles written about how the attitude that Ebû Zer had to face these matters, how it was linked to the ideological and social events of the last century. When it comes to Ebû Zer, it is extremely noticeable that it comes into issues such as labour, property, capital, private property, the agenda of concepts such as Islamic socialism and Marxism, it is presented as an anti-capitalism person, it is said of its "revolutionary" nature. The subject of this article is to discuss whether the information contained in the sources about it is sufficient to point out the claims on this issue. This will also be done with the comparative analysis of some of the popular works written in recent times.