Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 39
 İndirme 10
İsnad Çalışmaları ve İttisalın İspatı Bağlamında Muhaddislerin Metodlarındaki Kusur (Zâfiyet) İddiaları
2020
Dergi:  
Artuklu Akademi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Bu araştırmada iki ana konu hakkında  çalışma yaparak her konuyu doğrululuğu açısından değerlendireceğiz 1-         Senedin incelemesi : isnad metodu zayıf gören ve  çeşitli  ve doğru olmayan sözleri meşhur senedle ispatlanması kolay gören iddiaasında bulunan kimseler  vardır , isnad çalışmaları son asırlarda oluşmuş olup ilk dönemlerde mevcut olmayan bir çalışmadır , isnad inceleme  metodu hadis metninin doğrululuğna bakmaksızın daha çok senedi incelemesi ve doğrululuğu üzerine durmaktadır. 2-         Bağlılığın ispatı : bilindiği üzere bağlılığın ispatı kabul edilen  hadisin şartlarından birisidir , çünkü  rivayet eden  kimseler eğer her ravinin kendisinden öcneki  ravi  hadisi üzerine almazsa bu hadis doğru olmayan bir hadis olarak değerlendirilir . Hadis alimleri bibirinden hadis rivayeti eden ravilerin aralarındaki bağlantı ve bağlılığı doğrululuğunu tespit etmek için büyük çapa sarf etmişlerdir ve kendileri tarafından çıkan sonuç ve hükümleri doğruya daha yakın ve yanlıştan uzak olması için ilmi ve  derin kurallar belirlemişlerdir . Yanlız kendileri çağdaş ve akılcı medresesine nisbet eden ve hadis alimlerin çabaları tenkit eden , hadisçilerin bağlılık ispatındaki metodunu  kabul etmeyen  , hadisçilerin metodu bilgisel ve doğru kullanmadıkları için geçerliliği red eden  bir grup  ortaya çıkmıştır . Ravilerin birbilerinden işitmiş olmalarının kanaatındann hareket ederek bazı hadis  ravilerin aralarındaki bağlılığı kabul edip , aynı ravilerin başka bir hadisi ise ravilerin aralarındaki bağlılığı red etmişlerdir , böylece hadis alimlerinin sened bağlılığı hakkındaki vermiş oldukalrı hükümü sürekli red etmektedirler ve hadisçilerin bir hadisin şartlarından biri eksik olduğunda red hükmü verdikleri için   o hükmü kabul etmemektirler. Bu çalışmada detaylı olarak hadis alimlerininb bağlılık ispatı ya da reddi metodu ele alarak  akılcıların tenkitlerini açıklamaya çalışacağız.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Moderns' approach to the study of acne and proof of connection.
2020
Dergi:  
Artuklu Akademi
Yazar:  
Özet:

In this study, we will evaluate each subject from the point of accuracy of the first one: the examination of the first one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one: the examination of the second one. The proof of commitment: as it is known, the proof of commitment is one of the conditions of the accepted hadith, because those who righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously righteously. The scientists have spent a great deal to identify the accuracy of the connection and commitment between the rabbits who have had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had. Only a group of people who compared themselves to the contemporary and intellectual mediation and who rejected the efforts of the hadith scientists, who did not accept the method of the hadithists in the proof of devotion, who denied validity because the hadithists did not use the method of knowledge and correctness. In the words of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) In this study, we will try to explain in detail the facts of the hadith scientists and the proof of commitment or the method of rejection.

The Approach Of Muhadditheen In Study Of The Isnad and Proving Communication
2020
Dergi:  
Artuklu Akademi
Yazar:  
Özet:

This research is based on two main axes that are discussed and shown in each of them. The first axis is the study of the verses. Some claim that the approach is simple and easy to penetrate, so you should mention a famous endorsement and paste whatever you want. The anchors were too late, not known by the first centuries. This approach is also a formal approach based on the study of the fundamentals, without regard to what leads to these fundamentals of the phenomenon of mutilation. The second axis is proof of communication, as it is known that proof of communication is one of the conditions of the accepted hadeeth, it is not correct to talk unless the Rao talk to those who are above it. The Muhadditheen have made strenuous efforts to verify the connection between the ruwatul hadeeth moving from one another to each other and have put in place a lot of scientific disciplines that make their judgments more correct and far from wrong. However, a group of those who resisted to criticize the efforts of Muhadditheen who attribute themselves to the modern mental school did not follow the approach of the Muhadditheen in proving the connection, so they approached the approach of the Muhadditheen in criticism, and sentenced them to shortcomings, and marked the results of the imbalance, because they did not achieve contact with the correct scientific form, but assumed in ruwatul hadeeth They heard from each other. They also liked some of ruwatul hadeeth and confirmed the connection between them while they ruled on the conversations of other ruwatul hadeeth of the interruption, although the state of knowledge is one, and this is what made them respond to the provisions of the Hadeeths to connect the texts, and then their rulings in the acceptance of the conversations to disrupt the condition of communication. In this research we will discuss the method of modernists in proving the connection or judgment against it, with the criticism of the rationalists.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Artuklu Akademi

Alan :   İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 199
Atıf : 177
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.178
Artuklu Akademi