Özet:

Abstract The disadvantages of known publication quality metrics are found: the metric level papers characterize the properties of individual articles without regard to their connection with other publications, the author level metrics did not take into account the relationship of publications of different authors, and journal level metrics are not applicable to individual articles and for individual scientists. The complex of scientific publications inter-paper metrics is proposed firstly. It allow to quantify the properties of scientific publications. The complex contains metrics that take into account the relationship of articles and their vocabulary, metrics taking into account the citation and vocabulary items, as well as at the author and journal level metrics allowing to obviate the disadvantages of the known metrics. The use of the proposed metrics allows to automate the analysis and comparison of scientific publications and periodicals. References Article-Level Metrics. A SPARC Primer. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.sparc.arl.org 2. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web [Electronic resource] / Page L., Brin S., Motwani R., Winograd T. – Stanford : Stanford InfoLab, 1999. – Access mode: http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/1/1999-66.pdf 3. Moed H. F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals / H. F. Moed // Journal of Informetrics. – 2010. – Vol. 4, № 3. – P. 265–277. 4. Gonz lez-Pereira B. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator / B. Gonz lez-Pereira, V. P. Guerrero-Bote, F. Moya-Anegуn // Journal of informetrics. – 2010. – Vol. 4, № 3. – P. 379–391. 5. Guerrero-Bote V. P. A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator / V. P. Guerrero-Bote, F. Moya-Aneg n // Journal of Informetrics. – 2012. – Vol. 6, № 4. – P. 674–688. 6. Butler D. Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market / D. Butler // Nature. – 2008. – Vol. 451, № 6. – P. 6. 7. Falagas M. E. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor / M. E. Falagas, V. D. Kouranos, R. Arencibia-Jorge, D. E. Karageorgopoulos // The FASEB Journal. – 2008. – Vol. 22, № 8. – P. 2623–2628. 8. Bergstrom C. T. The Eigenfactor Metrics / C. T. Bergstrom, J. D. West, M. A. Wiseman // Journal of Neuroscience. – 2008. – Vol. 28, № 45. – P. 11433–11434. 9. Hirsch J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output / J. E. Hirsch // Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences. 2005. – Vol. 102, № 46. – P. 16569–16572. 10.Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index / L. Egghe // Scientometrics. – 2006. – Vol. 69, № 1. – P. 131–152. 11. Woeginger G. J. An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index / G. J. Woeginger // Journal of Informetrics. – 2008. – Vol. 2, № 4. – P. 364–368.

Anahtar Kelimeler: