Görüntüleme
27
İndirme
2
Çalışmamızda öncelikle tahkim kavramı hakkında bilgilendirme yapılmış, tahkim yargılaması incelenmiş, sonrasında ise asıl konumuz olan tahkim yargılamasının hüküm ile sona ermesi hususu sistematik olarak ele alınmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında özellikle UNCITRAL Model Kanunu referans alınarak MTK ve HMK incelenmiştir. ISTAC Tahkim Kuralları ise ICC Tahkim Kuralları ile karşılaştırılarak incelenmiş, söz konusu kuralların birbirine benzedikleri veya farklılaştığı noktalara temas edilmiştir. Çalışmamızda ayrıca muhtelif kanun ve kurallar içinde farklı maddelerde ele alınan tahkim yargılamasının sona ermesi durumları derlenmiş ve karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Ülkemiz mevzuatında dünyanın pek çok ülkesinde olduğu gibi UNCITRAL Model Kanunu’na uyumlandırılmış kanunlar ve kurallar mevcuttur. Milletlerarası uyuşmazlıkların vazgeçilmez adresi olan Tahkim Yargılaması için milli ve milletlerarası mevzuatın uyumlu olmasının kritik ve elzem olduğu yadsınamaz bir gerçektir. Öte yandan yapılacak bir doktrin araştırmasında da görüleceği üzere milletlerarası doktrinde dahi bu konuya gereken önem verilmemiştir. Bu nedenle yeterli kaynak ve inceleme mevcut değildir. Bu eksiklik uygulamada da ciddi sorunlara neden olmaktadır. Özellikle hakem kararlarının, “hüküm” ve “hakem emri” olarak ikili ayrıma tabi tutulmamasının uygulamada sorunlara neden olduğu ve olacağı çalışmamızda yer verdiğimiz örnek mahkeme kararları üzerinden incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda doktrinde Hüküm ve Hakem Emri kavramlarının oturtulması ve böylece karar merciinde olan hakem veya hakem kurlunun ve ayrıca hâkimlerin kanunu bu kavramlar ışığında yorumlamasını sağlamanın bir gereklilik olduğu kanaatine vardığımızdan bu iki kavramdan hareketler tahkim yargılamasının hüküm sona ermesi hususu sistematik olarak incelenmiştir.
In our work, first information was made about the concept of arbitration, the arbitration was studied, then the issue of the arbitration, which is our main subject, was systematically discussed with judgment. In the framework of the study, specifically referring to the UNCITRAL Model Law, MTK and HMK were studied. The ISTAC Arbitration Rules are examined compared to the ICC Arbitration Rules, addressing the points where the rules are similar or differentiated. In our study we also compiled and compared the circumstances of the end of the arbitration trial discussed in different matters within the various laws and rules. In our country legislation, as in many countries of the world, there are laws and rules that are in accordance with the UNCITRAL Model Act. It is a remarkable fact that the compatibility of national and international legislation for arbitration, which is the indispensable address of international disputes, is critical and essential. On the other hand, the doctrine that is to be done, as it will be seen in the international doctrine, has not been given the necessary attention to this subject. Therefore, there are not sufficient sources and research available. This lack of practice also causes serious problems. In particular, the examples of judgment decisions, the non-conduct of bilateral separation as "diction" and "judgment order" have been examined through the examples of judgment decisions that we have included in our work and will be caused by problems in practice. In this context, the doctrine of the settlement of the concepts of Judgment and Judgment Order and thus the judgment of the judgment or judgment board and also the need for the interpretation of the law in the light of these concepts has been systematically studied the issue of the end of the judgment of the judgment of the two concepts.
In the scope of our study, after giving biref information about arbitral proceeding we have focused systematically on termination of arbitral proceeding via award. In the context of the research, Turkish International and Domestic Arbitration Rules (MTK, HMK) investigated based on UNCITRAL Model Law, on the other hand ISTAC Arbitration Rules has examined based on the ICC Arbitration Rules. During the study, we tried to explore similarites and differences among the national and the international rules and regulations about the arbitration. One of the main purpose of the study is to collect the items in the different rules and national laws which is related with termination of proceeding and perform comparative analysis of the such regulations. As we see during the study, as any other country in the World, we have national laws which are mostly in allignment with the UNCITRAL Model Law. Harmonizaiton among the national and international arbitraiton law which become an essential part of the international commerce is a püre fact which is not ignorable. On the other hand, after brief literature survey we can easily see that there is a lack of academic records on the termination of proceeding area in the arbitration law both in the nataional and international law. Especially in our country, this deficiency causes serious problems in the arbitral proceeding and the enforcement of the awards. In our study, we try to make a classficiation for the decisions as the award and the order. And we tried to indicate the problems that arises because of the lack of clasfication for the decisions by investigations of the tribunal decisions. Conesquently, we believe that it is necessary to make a classfication as award and order, clarify the differences between the different type of decisions is crucial for our naitonal law. For this reason, in our study we tried to make clear the differences between different type of decisions and we focused on the terminaiton fo proceeding via award systematically in this context.
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
