User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 52
 Downloands 19
Bulanık AHP ve bulanık TOPSIS ile bütünleşik karar destek modeli önerisi: Özel okullarda öğretmen seçimi
2019
Journal:  
Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Çok sayıda alternatif ve kriterin bulunduğu karar problemlerinin çözümü için geliştirilen yöntemler, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Birbirleriyle çelişen çok sayıda kriter ve alternatifin bulunduğu karar problemlerinde bulanıklık ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi (AHP) ve Bulanık TOPSIS yöntemleri ile bütünleşik bir karar destek modeli önerilmiştir. Çalışmada; karar vermede etkili olan kriterlerin önem ağırlıkları Bulanık AHP ile belirlenmiş, alternatiflerin sıralama ve seçimi ise Bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Uygulama kısmında özel okullarda öğretmen seçimi, önerilen karar destek yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Önerilen yöntemin karar destek modeli olarak başarılı bir şekilde kullanılabileceği görülmüştür.

Keywords:

Bulanık AHP ve bulanık TOPSIS ile bütünleşik karar destek modeli önerisi: Özel okullarda öğretmen seçimi
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The methods developed to solve decision-making problems with numerous alternatives and criteria are defined as multi-criteria decision-making methods. There are many criteria and alternatives that are contradictory to each other. This study proposed an integrated decision support model with the Bully Analytical Hierarchy (AHP) and the Bully TOPSIS methods. In the study; the importance of criteria that are effective in decision-making is determined by the Bully AHP, and the ranking and selection of alternatives is made by the Bully TOPSIS method. The selection of teachers in private schools in the application section was carried out with the recommended decision support method. It has been shown that the proposed method can be successfully used as a decision support model.

Integrated Decision Support Model With Fuzzy Ahp and Fuzzy Topsis: Teacher Selection In Private School
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

The methods developed for solving decision problems in which there are numerous alternatives and criteria are defined as multi criteria decision making methods. Fuzziness can occur in decision problems in which many criteria and alternatives conflict with each other. In this study, a decision support model integrated with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy (AHP) and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods is proposed. In this study; the importance weights of the criteria that are effective in decision making are determined by Fuzzy AHP and the ranking selection of the alternatives are done by Fuzzy TOPSIS method. In the application part, the selection of teachers in private schools was carried out by the proposed decision support method. It has been seen that the proposed method can be successfully used as a decision support model.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 942
Cite : 8.640
2023 Impact : 0.336
Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi