Citation Number
3
Views
98
Downloands
35
This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Perceptions of God Scale (PGS; Halstead & Hautus, 2013). Participants were 360 university students. Results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the 16 items loaded on two factors (loving god, conditional god) and the two-dimensional model was well fit (x²= 264.43, df= 97, RMSEA= .069, CFI= .91, IFI= .91, NFI= .85, RFI= .82, GFI= .92, SRMR= .069). Internal consistency reliability coefficients were .83 for loving god subscale, .56 for conditional god, and .67 for overall scale. The corrected item-total correlations of PGS ranged from .10 to .68. Factor loadings ranged from .27 to .77. These results demonstrate that this scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Perceptions of God Scale (PGS; Halstead & Hautus, 2013). The participants were 360 university students. Results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the 16 items loaded on two factors (loving god, conditional god) and the two-dimensional model was well fit (x2= 264.43, df= 97, RMSEA= .069, CFI= .91, IFI= .91, NFI= .85, RFI= .82, GFI= .92, SRMR= .069). Internal consistency reliability coefficients were .83 for loving god subscale, .56 for conditional god, and .67 for overall scale. The corrected item-total correlations of PGS ranged from .10 to .68. Factor loadings ranged from .27 to .77. These results demonstrate that this scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
Field : Eğitim Bilimleri; Güzel Sanatlar; İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley