Abstract:

This research aims at developing a valid and reliable measurement tool that will enable the design and use of materials supported by information technology to measure their own skills. The data of the study was collected from 344 social information teachers candidates during the 2018-2019 educational year. In the study, the expert opinion was applied for the scale scale validity, the Opinion Factor Analysis (AFA) and the Verification Factor Analysis (DFA) were applied for the structural validity of the reviews made from the measurements. The AFA resulted in a structure consisting of 28 substances and four factors, which describes 59,024% of the total variance. The emerging factors are called "Creating Material", "Using", "Acquired Content" and "Converting Resources into Teaching Materials". The findings from DFA have shown that the 28 matters and four-factor structure in relation to the scale of the Materials Design and Use Qualification supported by Information Technology have sufficient conformity indicators. The conformity indicators of the measurement are x2/sd=2,535; RMSEA=,067; CFI=,903; SRMR=,053; PNFI=,769; IFI=,904, PGFI=,712. The Cronbach Alfa reliability ratio for the reliability of measurements obtained from the Design and Use-Supported Material Scale has been found to be within acceptable limits. For the purpose of determining the differentiability of the substances in the scale, the correlation of the substance corrected with the total correlation of the substance was placed in the lower top group comparisons of 27%. The findings from the substance analysis have shown that all the substances in the scale are distinguishing. Based on these findings, it is believed that the Information Technology-supported Material Design and Use Qualification Scale is a measurement tool that produces valid and reliable measurements and that it can be used in determining the level of self-qualification for the design and use of the information technology-supported material.

Keywords: