User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 11
 Downloands 1
Literatürdeki Maksillofasiyal Metastaz Vakalarının Retrospektif Analizi
2020
Journal:  
Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Metastatik tümörler maksillofasiyal bölgede nadir görülmekte, genellikle geç evrede, yaygın bir hastalığın göstergesi olarak ortaya çıkmakta ve prognozu kötü olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı maksillofasiyal bölgedeki metastatik tümör vakalarıyla ilgili güncel literatürü değerlendirerek, vakaların klinik ve radyolojik özelliklerini bildirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Pubmed veri tabanında, son 5 yıl içerisinde vaka raporu olarak yayınlanmış maksillofasiyal bölge metastatik tümörleri tarandı. Hastaların yaş ve cinsiyet bilgileri, primer ve metastatik tümörün histolojik tanısı, bulunduğu bölge, klinik ve radyolojik bulguları, tedavi ve prognozu analiz edildi. Bulgular: Literatürün incelenmesi sonucunda, 1469 makale bulundu. Başlık ve özetleri incelendi ve maksillofasiyal bölgede metastaz bulunan 131 vaka raporu belirlendi. Yetersiz hasta ve metastaz bilgisi bulunan makaleler inceleme dışı bırakılarak, değerlendirmeye uygun olan 89 vaka raporunda 91 hastanın (58 erkek, 33 kadın) bilgileri incelendi. Primer tümör bölgeleri erkeklerde en sık böbrek (% 27,6), kadınlarda meme (% 27,3) olarak tespit edildi. Mandibular kemik (% 28,6) ve gingiva (% 26,4) maksillofasiyal metastazın en sık görüldüğü bölgelerdi. En sık gözlenen klinik bulgu ve belirti şişlik (% 54,9) ve ağrı (% 31,9) olarak belirlendi. Olguların % 35,2’sinde maksillofasiyal bölgedeki tümörün primer tümörden önce teşhis edildiği belirlendi. Sonuç: Literatür incelemesi sonucunda, birçok vaka raporunda, hasta ve klinik bilgilerinin tümünün belirtilmediği gözlendi. Farklı bölgedeki maligniteler, maksillofasiyal metastaz yapabilir. Metastatik tümörlerde patognomonik bulgu ve belirtilerin olmaması nedeniyle ayırıcı tanıda detaylı bir klinik, radyolojik ve histopatolojik inceleme gerekmektedir. Klinisyenler, maksillofasiyal bölgede yeni teşhis edilen bir malignitenin uzak bölgelerden metastaz olabileceğini ve primer tümörden önce bulgu ve belirti verebileceğini göz önünde bulundurmalıdır.

Keywords:

Retrospective Analysis of Maxillophasial Metastasis Cases in Literature
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Metastatic tumors are rare in the maxillophasial area, usually in the late stages, appear as a indicator of a common disease and the prognosis is poor. The aim of this study is to report the clinical and radiological characteristics of the cases, by evaluating the current literature on metastatic tumor cases in the maxillopathic area. Tool and Method: In the Pubmed database, metastatic tumors of the maxillophasial area, published as a case report in the last 5 years, have been scaned. The patient’s age and gender information, the histological diagnosis of the primary and metastatic tumor, the area where it is located, clinical and radiological findings, treatment and prognosis were analyzed. Results: The study of literature found 1469 articles. The headlines and summaries were examined and 131 cases of metastases in the maxillophasial area were identified. Articles with insufficient patient and metastasis information were discharged, and in the 89 case report, which was suitable for evaluation, 91 patients (58 men, 33 women) were examined. Primary tumor areas were detected in the kidneys of men (27.6 percent), and in the breasts of women (27.3 percent). Mandibular is the area where the bones (28.6%) and gingiva (26.4%) are metastatic. The most frequently observed clinical findings and symptoms were identified as swelling (54.9%) and pain (31.9%) In 35.2% of cases, the tumor in the maxillophasial area was diagnosed before the primary tumor. Result: As a result of the literature study, many case reports observed that the patient and clinical information were not all stated. Malignities in different areas can cause maxillophasial metastases. Due to the absence of pathognomonic findings and symptoms in metastatic tumors, a detailed clinical, radiological and histopathological examination is required for the distinctive diagnosis. Clinics should take into account that a newly diagnosed malignity in the maxillopathic area may be metastases from remote areas and may give detection and signs before the primary tumor.

Keywords:

Retrospective Analysis Of Maxillofacial Metastasis Case Reports In Literature
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Metastatic tumors are observed rarely in maxillofacial region, usually appear in late stage as an indicator of a widespread disease and have poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current literature about metastatic tumor cases in maxillofacial region and to report their clinical and radiological features. Pubmed database were searched for published case reports of maxillofacial metastatic tumors in last 5 years. Patients’ age, gender, histologic diagnosis of primary and metastatic tumors, location, clinical and radiological findings, treatment and prognosis were recorded. As a result of literature review, 1469 articles were found. Titles and abstracts were analyzed and 131 maxillofacial metastasis case reports were detected. The articles with insufficient information excluded and 91 patients (58 male, 33 female) in 89 case reports were evaluated. The most common primary tumor sites were kidney (27,6%) for males and breast (27,3%) for females. Mandibular bone (28,6%) and gingiva (26,4%) were most frequent sites of maxillofacial metastasis. Swelling (54,9%) and pain (31,9%) were the most common clinical signs and symptoms. In 35.2% of the cases, the tumor in the maxillofacial region was diagnosed before the primary tumor. It was observed that all clinical and radiographic information about patients were not reported in many case reports. Malignancies of different regions can cause maxillofacial metastasis. Due to the absence of pathognomonic signs and symptoms of metastatic tumors, a detailed clinical, radiological and histopathological examination is required for differential diagnosis. Clinicians should consider that a diagnosed malignancy in maxillofacial region may be metastasis and may even give signs and symptoms before the diagnosis of primary tumor.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 832
Cite : 510
Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi