User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 17
 Downloands 3
Comparison of Zwolle, Cadillac and Syntax-2 risk scores in predicting contrast nephropathy development in patients with ST elevation
2019
Journal:  
Annals of Medical Research
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: It is known that early prediction of the patients who may develop contrast-induced is nephropathy (CIN) and initiate prophylactic treatment to reduce the risk of morbidity-mortality, hospitalization and prolonged length of stay. In our study, we aimed to compare the Zwolle, Cadillac and Syntax 2 (SS-2) risk scores that are currently used in the management of and predict mortality in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in terms of predicting CIN development.Material and Methods: We enrolled 1622 patients who were diagnosed as STEMI and underwent primary coronary angiography between July 2014 and December 2018. 1381 patients were taken to the final analysis and two groups; CIN - (n=1295) and CIN + (n=86) were formed. Risk scores were compared in terms of CIN prediction.Results: The mean age of the patients was 62±8 years and 72% of them were males. SS-2, Zwolle and Cadillac scores were significantly higher in CIN+ group (all p values 0.001). A comparative ROC curve analysis was performed for the estimation and clinical use of CIN. In the ROC curve analysis, the cut-off value for SS-2 was 16.7 (AUC:0.82) with a sensitivity of 80.1% and a specificity of 58%. The cut-off value for Cadillac was 1.5 (AUC:0.80), 78% sensitivity and 58% specificity. For Zwolle, the cut-off value was 2.5 (AUC:0.75) and the sensitivity was 73% and the specificity was 69%.Conclusions: CIN, which develops after coronary angiography in STEMI patients, causes an increase in morbidity and mortality. The risk scores used in STEMI patients, in particular SS-2, may be more useful in predicting the development of CIN than in the Zwolle and Cadillac scores.Keywords: Zwolle; Cadillac; Syntax 2 score; contrast induced nephropathy.  Downloads Download data is not yet available. Article Details How to Cite Kalkan, K. (2021). Comparison of Zwolle, Cadillac and Syntax-2 risk scores in predicting contrast nephropathy development in patients with ST elevation . Annals of Medical Research, 26(7), 1197–1200. Retrieved from https://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/1298 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Volume 26 Issue 7 (2019): July Section Original Articles CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Annals of Medical Research

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 3.232
Cite : 295
2023 Impact : 0.008
Annals of Medical Research