Abstract:

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to study the effect of 2 different adhesive systems and 3 different composite resins on the surface of the flat dents on the determination of the micro voltage bonding force (μTBS) and on the bonding resistance. Tools and Methods: 24 pieces of humans 3 large small teeth are prepared with flat deep teeth surfaces. The teeth are randomly selected, divided into two groups: Self-etch (Futurabond M SingleDose VOCO) and Total-etch (37% phosphoric acid Condac 37, Adeziv 200T 3M). The groups were restored by applying 3 different composite resins (X-tra Fill VOCO, SonicFill Kerr, Grandio VOCO) to be divided into 3 subgroups. From the center of all teeth, a sample was obtained in the form of a six-part strip. All samples have been tested with microwave. Statistical Analysis Tests of Sigmaplot 12. It was implemented in 5 packages. The Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey tests were used.The findings: A statistically significant difference between the median values of the groups was found (p=0,010). According to the results of the Tukey test (p<0.05); in the Adeziv 200T 3M group, the difference between the Grandio VOCO (incremental) composite and the X-tra Fill VOCO (bulk) composite (p=0.008) and the SonicFill Kerr (bulk) composite resin (p=0.022) scattering link resistance data was statistically meaningful. In the Futurabond M SingleDose group, there was no statistically significant difference between the compounds’ scattering binding resistance data (p>0.05). The result: While there is no difference between the adjective systems in the dentine bonding resistance; the traditional incremental composite has been found more successful than the Bulk-fill composite.

Keywords: