Özet:

The aim is to compare the performance of participating banks in Turkey with conventional banks during the 2008 global financial crisis. This comparison determines how the participating banks have the understanding of the management of the deposit banks during the crisis period. The concept of bank management is an indicator of how the economy looks by them. Method - The financial statements of four participating banks and four conventional banks between 2006 and 2012 were analyzed with the financial rates (rationals) which are one of the traditional financial methods to that goal. The results obtained have been observed by comparing the tendency on the graph. Results - participating banks are better than conventional banks over the period in terms of active profitability and self-resource profitability. Only at the end of the period, conventional banks in their active profitability have become quite close to the participating banks. In terms of net profit exchange, the participating banks are partly stable, while the conventional banks are quite wave-wave. After one or two months of damage, a very high snow rate was captured. Discussions - The results obtained here are significantly similar to the results of the study on similar topics. And when it comes to them, there are signs of the righteousness. Another thing is that participating banks are better than conventional banks in terms of subsequent loans. On the contrary, other studies have found a result of a significant decrease in the loans given by conventional banks during the period.

Anahtar Kelimeler: