Özet:

This is the case of the Lord (Muhammad). 982/1574) is a short resale in Turkish which is written by Galatât-i Avâm, a work called Şehrî Mustafa Şevket. The book was written by 1291/1874. First, a biographical experiment was carried out on the 38-year-old who died and did not find any detailed information about his life in academic studies, then the views on the concept of galat were evaluated by studying the explanations of Mustafa Shevket, who seemed to have a broad knowledge of Arabic language and Islamic sciences. Sharih wrote the reasons for some of the words that were misused in this discourse with detailed language knowledge, and also briefed a significant part of it; thus he showed that his work was written in address to people with a better level of Arabic speech knowledge. On the other hand, where he sees it necessary, he also gave the Turkish responses of the Arabic words and expressed his objection in points where Ebussuûd did not join the Lord. Mustafa Shevket, taking into account the alternative movements in the lies he negotiated throughout the ceremony, has partly accepted the view that the gallates have not shown a firm position in the different readings that can be correctly accepted, and that the words can gain different meanings when used and within the ground.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Özet:

In this study, the commentary written by Şehrî Mustafa Şevket (d. 1291/1874) for the work titled Galatât-ı Avâm, which is a short treatise written in Turkish by Ebussuûd Efendi (d. 982/1574), is discussed. First, the biography of the commentator, who died at the age of 38 and whose life is not detailed in academic studies, is written. Then, the explanations in the treatise written by Mustafa Şevket, who has extensive knowledge of the Arabic language and Islamic sciences, are examined and his views on the concept of galat are evaluated. Mustafa Şevket expounds the reasons for some of the misused words with grammatical rules. Therefore he also briefly explains a significant part in this commentary. Thus, his work is understood by people with good knowledge of Arabic morphology rather than the general public. On the other hand, he mentions the Turkish meanings of Arabic words when deemed necessary and expresses his objections at points where he is disagree with Ebussuud Efendi. Mustafa Şevket, who also takes into account the alternative accentuation in the lexicons he referenced throughout his commentary, acceptes the different pronunciation of galats. He partly adoptes the view that words can acquire different meanings depending on the time and place.