Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 11
 İndirme 1
Comparison Of Real-time Pcr, Indirect Immunofluorescence Antibody Assay, and Different Staining Techniques For The Diagnosis Of Pneumocystis Jirovecii
2020
Dergi:  
Annals of Medical Research
Yazar:  
Özet:

Aim: Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii (P. jirovecii), is an opportunistic infection with a severe progression, often observed in immunocompromised patients. The diagnosis is difficult due to the non-specific clinical and radiological findings. Therefore, rapid and accurate diagnosis of the agent is important in terms of timely implementation of the treatment. In this study, it was aimed to detect P. jirovecii by Giemsa staining, Modified Toluidine Blue O staining (MTolB), indirect immunofluorescent antibody (IIFA) assay, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in clinical samples obtained from patients suspected of having PCP.Material and Methods: Respiratory tract samples (23 oral wash, 19 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and eight induced sputum samples) of 50 patients referred to the Microbiology Laboratory of Gazi University Health Application and Research Hospital with the suspicion of PCP were analyzed. The presence of P. jirovecii in the respiratory tract samples was investigated by Giemsa staining, MTolB staining, IIFA (Pneumocell, Cellabs Pty Ltd, Australia), and real-time PCR (the primers targeting the DHFR gene).Results: Of the 50 samples included in the study, four (8%) with MTolB, five (10%) with Giemsa, seven (14%) with IIFA, and seven (14%) with real-time PCR were positive. When real-time PCR was accepted as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity values were found to be 85.7% and 97.7%, respectively for IIFA, 71.4% and 100%, respectively for Giemsa and 57% and 100%, respectively for MTolB. There was almost perfect agreement between the results of real-time PCR and IIFA (κ=0.92). In the comparison between PCR and cytochemical staining methods, Giemsa had almost perfect agreement with PCR (κ=0.92) and had a higher coefficient compared to MTolB (κ=0.88). Conclusion: It is considered that it would be more beneficial to use IIFA and real-time PCR tests together in the diagnosis of P. jirovecii. Downloads Download data is not yet available. Article Details How to Cite Gozde Durgut, E., Kustimur, S., Aydin, M., Kalkanci, A., & Dogruman Al, F. (2021). Comparison of real-time PCR, indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay, and different staining techniques for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii . Annals of Medical Research, 27(1), 0244–0251. Retrieved from https://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/556 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Volume 27 Issue 1 (2020): January Section Original Articles CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Null
2020
Yazar:  
0
2020
Yazar:  
Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler










Annals of Medical Research

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 3.232
Atıf : 274
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini