Özet:

The Ministry of National Education has made an update covering 51 programmes in the programmes corrected by various revisions until 2015-2016 and has appealed to the opinions and recommendations of the educational environments regarding the updated programmes. It is very important to get support from civil society organizations and educational unions with different opinions to prevent the potential problems that occur during the implementation of the programs. In this context, the MEB has published a report in the program assessment process carried out with the "System of Monitoring and Evaluation of Teaching Programs" implemented and it can be stated that the use of the work of the representative high school unions will have a positive impact on this process. For this purpose, the research sought to reveal the assessments made by the educational syndicates on the educational programs renewed in 2017 in various dimensions. Thus, it is intended to contribute to the field by identifying organizations made up of individuals with different perspectives of society on the assessment of the teaching programmes. This study is an illustrative and qualitative research that aims to compare the program evaluation reports published by educational unions, to reveal findings and to analyze them in a way based on the scope. Depending on the number of members, some of the results obtained within the framework of research limited to the opinions of the representative power of the higher education unions can be stated as follows: the evaluation reports prepared by the unions, general opinions on the programs, the study and evaluation of the programs, the evaluation and recommendations made according to the stages and courses. These reports are criticized by a draft proposal prepared by MEB. Instead, it is recommended that the renewal of the programs is more in the idea phase and that the stakeholders are referring to the opinions and that the programs are permanent after the pilot implementation is made. The change of the program should be shared with the public by reasoning, stressing that this change is contrary to the scientific methods to be implemented without the current situation research. However, the concept of philosophy adopted in the programs is also criticized in various aspects. It is also noted that some of the achievements included in the programs are not in accordance with the student level, that these achievements are not linked to the content and have technical errors. Finally, it is wrong that the programs do not include the methods to measure the students’ skills in the mental, sensual and devil fields and that the teachers’ qualification levels are not specified at the point of evaluation of their superior thinking skills. In the framework of the assessments they have made on the programs, it may be recommended to contribute to the evaluation work of the program: The teaching programs planned to be developed/modified by the MEB should be taken into the process of development/modification by cooperating with teachers, trade unions and various civil society organizations while in the more ideas stage. The programs prepared as a result of this process must be observed by pilot application, the deficiencies must be removed and transmitted to the latest general application. The programmes prepared by MEB should be organized in such a way that the achievements are clear, transparent, understandable and will be in accordance with the student’s level. Programs with more explicit and concrete practices related to the measurement evaluation processes should be prepared. In order to be able to prepare an effective and consistent program, it must first be identified the needs, expectations and beliefs that cover all sections of society, and the knowledge gained from it must be clearly and clearly reflected in the philosophy of the programs.