In this study, the relationship between individuals’ level of hope and their thoughts about future was determined by multinomial logistic regression analyses. For this purpose, it has been benefited from the data from TSI’ s 2014 Life Satisfaction Survey that was applied to 7984 individuals. In the first stage of implementation, Chi-Square test of independence were applied to variables that were thought to have relation with hope level in survey. Study is made with 4 variables once Non-significant variables were removed. The validity of the model examined in this study was calculated by the maximum likelihood estimates and was found significant. Odd ratios of the variables in the model were obtained. Comparison of three categories was carried out based on the selected reference categories and depending on the coefficients odds ratios. For comparison 1, coefficient odds values related to the variables of future comparison, economic, social rights and public service encounter were found significant. While for comparison 2, coefficient odds values related to the variables of future comparison, economic and public service encounter were found significant; for comparison 3, coefficient odds values related to the variables of future comparison were found significant.
In this study, the relationship between individuals' level of hope and their thoughts about the future was determined by multinomial logistic regression analyses. For this purpose, it has been benefited from the data from TSI’s 2014 Life Satisfaction Survey that was applied to 7984 individuals. In the first stage of implementation, Chi-Square test of independence were applied to variables that were thought to have a relationship with hope level in survey. The study is made with 4 variables once Non-significant variables were removed. The validity of the model examined in this study was calculated by the maximum likelihood estimates and was found significant. Odd ratio of the variables in the model were obtained. Comparison of three categories was carried out based on the selected reference categories and depending on the coefficients odds ratio. For comparison 1, coefficient odds values related to the variables of future comparison, economic, social rights and public service encounter were found significant. While for comparison 2, coefficient odds values related to the variables of future comparison, economic and public service encounter were found significant; for comparison 3, coefficient odds values related to the variables of future comparison were found significant.
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|